Форум » Feedback and Ideas

Last.fm is not handling the feedback well, IMHO

 
  • Always fun to stop by and visit the thread each weekend. I see this thread continues because the issues it raised are still active, unhappy customers keep adding their feedback nearly every day, and these issues remain unaddressed by Last.fm. Oh, yes, I know, they gave the metalheads back their "paint it black" feature. And I know, that is supposed to appease us all in some way; but like the "adding the inbox link" if they hadn't taken that away in the new layout, they wouldn't have had to return it! They did fix the shoutbox bug, I grant them that, but again they wouldn't have had to fix it if they hadn't broken it. So basically, after six weeks, all they have done is make at most a half dozen minor fixes to correct blatant mistakes they introduced into the new site!

    But, as enlil correctly points out (who oddly and hypocritical suggests I should not post in this thread; hint: if you really don't care, then don't reply, no one forces you to come here, read the posts and reply) this thread was about "last.fm staff reactions to feedback." That was one of the purposes of the original post. Everything I said in the original post is still true on the poor quantity and quality of response to feedback. One thing I think some misunderstand - the feedback I and others are referring to is not just the angry reaction over the rollout (which you have to admit was poorly handled aside from any issues of whether the new site is good or bad) but also that the feedback during beta testing was ignored. The reason some customers were so angry was they said: "this, this, and that sucks" in beta testing, they were told their feedback mattered, then and they saw those same bad features sucking in the rollout.

    The other issue the original post raised was comparing the functionality of the old and new sites. Certain people want to always change the subject away from the functionality issue and send up a smoke screen about how customers are just complaining about the appearance of the new site. Well, yes a lot of people don't like the way the new site looks (BTW - the dismissive response from last.fm to that feedback has been part of the problem) but that is not the only issue. the bigger issue is the functionality! Post after post is made about the functionality and the feedback is "stop whining about how it looks." As I said in the original post (you should actually read it some time):

    The problem with the new site design is far more than just not being able to like a new layout immediately. Anyone who says that all it is quite frankly is being insulting and a little ignorant and/or arrogant. The problem is the functionality of the new site design is horrible. See my Google analogy above. The new design makes Last.fm irrelevant for the majority of Last.fm users and their major use for Last.fm - to easily discover new music. The reality is that the vast majority of people will not suffer much inconvenience trying to get to where they want to go on a Web site (That's Web Design 101). People will just go to a different site.
    People are leaving by the way, and I am NOT referring only to Alexa as evidence of that ;)

    On the functionality, I just went to my "Recommendations" to partially demonstrate my point. Still no user recommendations - that functionality was taken away by Last.fm. Only Last.fm's bizarre "Recommendations." Of the first 15 supposedly most relevant "Recommendations" six artists were already in my Library and the other nine were not even remotely related to any of my artists. Just because your code says an artist is related doesn't mean it is. Real humans did a much better job of recommending music than Last.fm's new code.That is the real difference between the old and new Last.fm, as I have been long saying - human versus corporate machine.

    Douglas

    P.S. - I love the response someone made to my calling the moderator's bluff that he found ONE person who liked the new site. The response was: "yeah, well only $13k people joined a group hating the new site." How silly of me not to realize that one is larger than 13,000 (actually 14,000). :: snark :: LOL.

    P.P.S. - I keep reading allusions made that I founded the "Bring back the old Last.fm" group. That is very flattering that you think I recruited 14,044 customers to form one of the largest groups on Last.fm, but please give Jedi_Amara who founded it all of the credit. :)

    DJ ProFusion
    WorldFusionRadio.com
    • [Удаленный пользователь] пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 4:46
    Old last.fm worked slow & clunky for me. The new one is much more easier and fun, plus I discovered cool stuff by recommendations.

    -Will write something longer later, gotta go-

    • spacefish пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 5:26
    LordDANEgerous said:
    perhaps not YOU bu i have found many non music related shouts where as in the old one i had found... almost none. and most tha did not apperar to where inside jokes that had to do with music. no longer.

    You obviously didn't visit my (friends') shoutbox(es) very often. ;) It's just the "it's new, it's noticed" syndrome. Like when you buy a new car suddenly you see that model everywhere. I really doubt there's that much of a difference in the way people use the shout box (except folks might actually use it less since its visibility has been reduced) and really, does it matter? What does it hurt you that other folks are communicating in whatever way that pleases them (provided it's not trolling, spam, etc.)? Someone asked you why one shout was more valid than the other. Do you really want to limit everyone to post "music-related" shouts only? Again, silly.

    • Jester-NL пишет...
    • Подписчик
    • Сен 1 2008, 6:31
    WFR: I can not (in the slightest) find myself in your Google analogy. Saying that all the functionality of the site is ruined because of the re-design is a gross overstatement. (Face it, that is what your analogy is saying...)
    I do however admit that I too miss the recommendations I got from friends and other users (although getting rid of the redundancy because I received that one recommendation 17 times is nice as well :P)
    A side note: I am overall quite surprised by the recommendations Last.fm offers me, in quite a few cases they are spot-on...

    If you really want to believe that Last.fm has listened to none of the feedback, I honestly wonder how it comes the site looks like it does now. There have been countless threads about the whole beta-process and how that was handled. Stating that nothing has been done with the feedback is as a crooked a statement as your statement that the whole functionality was thrown overboard in order to look good.

    P.S. - I love the response someone made to my calling the moderator's bluff that he found ONE person who liked the new site. The response was: "yeah, well only $13k people joined a group hating the new site." How silly of me not to realize that one is larger than 13,000 (actually 14,000). :: snark :: LOL.That is the second time you fail to understand that post. Now you are calling it 'my bluff'. I am not completely sure what you mean by that, (of course that can be because English is only my second language, silly me), but I think you are deliberately trying to ignore the fact that I (and many others) ask you to stop thinking for the silent majority and just speak for yourself. You can not speak for people you have never, ever met.

    Oh, and the fact that this thread is 'still' on page one... remember kicking it back to live a few days ago, from quite a few pages back ;)
    For the record, a lot of the postings in this thread are now "yeah, I hate it too"-posts -ignoring everything you said in your opening post-, or ones in which people discuss other posts (yours included). Too bad you fail in these discussions. You only drop by once in a while to repeat your not-really-new-statements...

    Remember to say "thank you" for the things you haven't had
    • DFA1979 пишет...
    • Подписчик
    • Сен 1 2008, 11:17
    LordDANEgerous said:
    perhaps not YOU bu i have found many non music related shouts where as in the old one i had found... almost none. and most tha did not apperar to where inside jokes that had to do with music. no longer.

    What's your point? It's a shoutbox. Not a music-related-communication-only-box. If I want to recommend a band or ask about a new album in somebody's shoutbox I'll do so, but if I want to ask them how they like their new job I'll also do so. Can you come up with any good reason I shouldn't? How does it affect you in the slightest what sort of things other people say in other people's shoutboxes anyway?

    The problem with the new site design is far more than just not being able to like a new layout immediately. Anyone who says that all it is quite frankly is being insulting and a little ignorant and/or arrogant. The problem is the functionality of the new site design is horrible. See my Google analogy above. The new design makes Last.fm irrelevant for the majority of Last.fm users and their major use for Last.fm - to easily discover new music. The reality is that the vast majority of people will not suffer much inconvenience trying to get to where they want to go on a Web site (That's Web Design 101). People will just go to a different site.
    People are leaving by the way, and I am NOT referring only to Alexa as evidence of that ;)

    True, some people are leaving the site or using it less. Other people are joining the site, or using it more. There's really no way of knowing which of those is a bigger group. Would you be so kind as to point us to the other (non-Alexa) evidence you're using for this?

    On the functionality, I just went to my "Recommendations" to partially demonstrate my point. Still no user recommendations - that functionality was taken away by Last.fm. Only Last.fm's bizarre "Recommendations." Of the first 15 supposedly most relevant "Recommendations" six artists were already in my Library and the other nine were not even remotely related to any of my artists. Just because your code says an artist is related doesn't mean it is. Real humans did a much better job of recommending music than Last.fm's new code.That is the real difference between the old and new Last.fm, as I have been long saying - human versus corporate machine. Well, that's a very different experience than I'm getting. My recommendations on the old site were rubbish, just a load of bands (The Cribs, The Kooks, etc.) I already knew and already disliked, but who sound a little bit like bands I listened to two years ago. Now my recommendations are great. None of them are in my library already, and they're all very relevant to what I'm listening to now (even to the extent that if I spend just a day listening to a lot of post-rock, all the post-rock bands in there will jump up to the top of the list). I won't claim I've listened to anywhere near all of my recommended artists, but those I have tried have all been good recommendations.

    • [Удаленный пользователь] пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 11:51
    By the way, on threads that actually suggested ideas, I saw alot of comments from the stuff. A thread like this doesn't suggest anything but "Let's stay outdated". Also, the site's functionality is also subjective. I already said I visit the site more often.

    • enlill пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 12:42
    I already said I visit the site more often.
    Same here...

    • marinfieraru пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 15:25
    I too am spending more time on the site now, as it is better overall in most respects than the old design. The last design was outdated in looks and no more logically laid out than this remake - people were simply used to finding things wherever they lay. Some missing features are very slow to return (what exactly has changed or been done in the last few weeks?), but new features such as live updating charts are far better than the weekly charts for example. The main decrease in functionality is with the social side of the site - mainly because things are now a few mouse clicks away from where they were before.

    • iglbebe пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 15:30
    He just loved the site. Just like I did, and I'm sure all the people in those anti-groups did. We all have our personal reasons and together we come to the conclusion that the new layout is a epic failure.

    The huge images, senselessly scattered content, endless scrolling to basic stuff which was just THERE and fine before, bla bla bla. Enough has been said.
    I personally think last.fm reached 0 of the goals they had with the new site.
    You just ended up, messing-up peoples favorite place.

    Through the darkness of futures past, the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds: Fire Walk With Me
    • enlill пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 15:38
    What about people who love the site now? Are they somewhat least important? Why yours loving should be looked at more?

    • marinfieraru пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 15:41
    I find nothing epically failing about the site - its not an epic success either as a remake, but its an improvement in many respects over the old in looks, functionality, informativeness and layout. And its even faster to load, despite the redundantly large artist images in the library, so I am not even complaining about that.

    The hyperbole used by people is quite fascinating - the site does nearly all the same old things it ever did, and added a few new tricks, yet this is deemed epic failure by some, destroyed functionality by others, and many other over the top statements. In actuality last.fm underwent an OK remake - hardly inspired as a design, but certainly not an epic failure. It continues to work well in its basic function to supply musical charts (in fact it works better than before), its still not totally coherent in its information flow, and its a bit more spread out than before. Epic failure? A mild disappointment that it wasn't a better remake possibly, but that's about it.

    Отредактировано: marinfieraru Сен 1 2008, 15:50
    • Babs_05 пишет...
    • Forum Moderator
    • Сен 1 2008, 15:41
    You know it's Monday when WFR resurrects this thread...

    • [Удаленный пользователь] пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 16:56
    iglbebe said:
    You just ended up, messing-up peoples favorite place.


    Please change that into:

    You just ended up, messing-up some peoples favorite place

    • stuartsjm пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 17:37
    The thing which I have trouble understanding is that this thread is about whether Last.fm listen to feedback, and there are all these people suggesting that they don't, yet when they are actually specifically asked for feedback the response isn't that great.

    For example on a recent blog post about the new Neighbours service the following was stated:

    Even if you’re not that interested in neighbours, here in the research team we’d really like to hear how you get on, as we can use what we learn about neighbours to help improve all our recommendation services.
    After more than a week there have only been 12 people feedback / contribute to the discussion in the Playground Forum, and a handful of relevant comments on the blog post. (Only 1 person has posted about the similar groups item)

    What I want to know is where are the 14,000 people from the Bring Back... group, and if people like WFR are so unhappy with the new recommendations system (I have no idea why because I think it is great) why are they not discussing ways to improve the system.

    Such is life, people are quick to criticise, but when they are asked to help improve something they look the other way.

    Отредактировано: stuartsjm Сен 1 2008, 17:42
    • [Удаленный пользователь] пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 17:41
    stuartsjm said:
    After more than a week there have only been 12 people feedback / contribute to the discussion in the Playground Forum, and a handful of relevant comments on the blog post. (Only 1 person has posted about the similar groups item)


    But there's also only 105 members in the group; I had no idea it even existed! I'm in now though :)

    • stuartsjm пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 17:51
    StudleyUK said:
    But there's also only 105 members in the group; I had no idea it even existed! I'm in now though :)

    It is specifically linked to at the top of the musical soulmates page though. Hence why I've been a little bit surprised by the lack of discussion, at least in comparison to the wealth of 'discussion' on threads such as this one anyway.

    • Jonty пишет...
    • Alumni
    • Сен 1 2008, 18:08
    WorldFusionRadio_com said:
    Still no user recommendations - that functionality was taken away by Last.fm.

    We never took away user recommendations, they just show up in the inbox now.

    Here's a screenshot of the inbox overview with a few different recs in it (album/track/event):


    And here's a view of an open recommendation message:


    If this isn't working for you, please let us know.
    --jonty

    • gwalla пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 1 2008, 19:29
    Jonty said:
    WorldFusionRadio_com said:
    Still no user recommendations - that functionality was taken away by Last.fm.

    We never took away user recommendations, they just show up in the inbox now.
    Those aren't user recommendations. They're just PMs with an icon next to them. They don't do anything.

    User recs used to show up in recommendation radio (if you had that option selected), which was the whole point: getting a friend to listen to something you think they might like.

    If user recommendations as recommendations are coming back, tell us. If that functionality was removed because the labels thought it gave people too much control over what they were listening to, tell us.

    • Babs_05 пишет...
    • Forum Moderator
    • Сен 2 2008, 2:24
    http://www.last.fm/forum/21717/_/434341/44#f7223013

    I won't quote all of WFR's latest post, that link will do.

    I was expecting something completely twisted so I saved it for later, I like a laugh from time to time...

    Actually, there's not that much that's twisted there. A few skewiff comments that everyone else has already picked up on, but by and large, not a bad post.

    On the point iglbebe made that he (WFR?) loved the site as it was, I think that's key. That's where all the emotion is coming from. I understand Last.fm had to improve its service and what we have right now is a work-in-progress. It's a gargantuan task and we're still pretty much at the beginning. As I said all along, the site won't be ready before Christmas at the earliest.

    On user recommendations - I really miss how it was set up before, especially being able to play User Reco Radio. But, I have to say, I'm not getting any spammy recos from total strangers like I used to. Tell a lie, I think I got one. It's no consolation though, it was easy to delete recos in the old system. And I did. User Recos in PMs is daft.

    On Last.fm listening to user feedback - I'm quite confused about this. I know they do. I know they have systems set up so all new threads are read and passed on to the relevant teams. I know they're working on improving comms both with users and in-house. But as WFR says, it's quite strange that some feedback hasn't been responded to since beta-testing days. It's the not knowing that's frustrating. On the other hand, it could be that Last.fm haven't worked out new solutions themselves yet. Unless I missed the posts where they responded.

    The point about functionality is very important. It's true, people have confused it with how the site looks. I don't really care all that much about how the site looks (apart from making shouts and journals more visible), but I do care about how the site WORKS. That's what functionality means. I've had to wait and wait to do the things I used to do in the old site. And today tagging is up the spout so I'm waiting again. I think we've got a bad release, on top of last week's bad release. Great.

    I'm not sure people are leaving. I have noticed people are spending less time here. But then again, to be fair, it's summer, we've had the Olympics and other events, people have other stuff going on in their lives, the summer trough is normal.

    I didn't agree with the sarcastic asides in WFR's post. Just thought I'd say.

    • spacefish пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 2 2008, 5:54
    Jonty, friends recommendations WERE removed from last.fm. You just replaced them with something you thought would be satisfactory. Unfortunately, it's not. Half the fun for me of listening to Recommendation Radio was sorting through all those my friends had sent me. Now however, I can't listen to those within the radio setting and so I'll likely never listen to them at all. The solution last.fm came up with really isn't the same thing so you can hardly call friend recommendations still available. As gwalla asked above, if there was a specific reason you removed this really excellent feature, please tell us.

    Отредактировано: spacefish Сен 2 2008, 6:03
    • spacefish пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 2 2008, 5:59
    stuartsjm said:
    The thing which I have trouble understanding is that this thread is about whether Last.fm listen to feedback, and there are all these people suggesting that they don't, yet when they are actually specifically asked for feedback the response isn't that great.

    For example on a recent blog post about the new Neighbours service the following was stated:

    Well, if they're asking for feedback on a medium not everyone reads, I wouldn't expect a lot. I don't read the blog myself. I forget it's there. Mostly because the link for it is smack at the bottom of the page. I believe the few times I have read any last.fm blog articles, it's been because they've been linked to by staff in my dashboard or by others here on the forums. It's just not that prominent. I'm not much of a blog reader anyway so the whole feed thing hasn't even occurred to me.

    • Babs_05 пишет...
    • Forum Moderator
    • Сен 2 2008, 6:00
    You can listen to user recos if you create a tag radio or playlist and add them. But what about non-subs? Can they?

    • spacefish пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 2 2008, 6:06
    That's a back-handed workaround. We never had to do that with the old recommendation system. User recs simply played when you tuned into to recommendation radio. Besides, it would be a long time before I'd ever actually get to listen to user recs if I used the tagging/playlist method. There are requirements for both in the number of tracks one must have before it will play.

    • Babs_05 пишет...
    • Forum Moderator
    • Сен 2 2008, 11:22
    • Beat_C пишет...
    • Пользователь
    • Сен 5 2008, 13:51
    WorldFusionRadio_com said:
    Real humans did a much better job of recommending music than Last.fm's new code.

    well said. i mean, i was being recommended carla bruni recently. aaaaaaaaarrrghhh!

    i really had hope in the beginning, about changes being made, and about last.fm handling the feedback better with time. but i guess i was being naive ...

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++
Анонимные пользователи не могут оставлять сообщения. Для того, чтобы писать в форумах, пожалуйста, войди на сайт или создай аккаунт.